Iron Man 2 wasn’t quite as good as Iron Man (to me; read what I wrote on that one), but neither will I say it was worse. It’s like getting a 97 on a test rather than a 98: it’s still an “A”, and that’s all that really matters. (And the first film gets a special bump because it so outperformed expectations. This one gave us pretty much what we wanted and expected, so it doesn’t come away with as much of a glow, as a result.)
There are two things to say with certainty:
- Robert Downey Jr. does a great job of playing Tony Stark, imbuing the character with more life than he had in the ’80s comics where I’m most familiar with him.
- At no time during the movie did I feel that the movie was thumbing its nose at the comic book connection, trying to void or avoid that connection. That’s a very good thing. There’s a certain trust that comic book-based movies have to live up to for the comic book fans, to find their own path but not seem to be kicking the comic book puppy in the process. X-Men: The Last Stand\, Spider-Man 3, and Superman Returns all failed in this, being more intent on being a movie than something part-and-parcel of the comics; they “kicked the puppy”, but Iron Man 2 did not. (Never forget that the reverse exists, too: call it “letting the puppy eat your steak” where a movie doesn't try to transcend the comic book — perhaps even embrcaes the worst stereotypes of the comics book — and becomes less as a result. See Superman IV: The Quest for Peace. No, on second thought, don't see it.)
Some other thoughts:
- The Nick Fury/SHIELD stuff was too strongly geared toward setting up for future Marvel movies (or I’m just too aware that it’s doing that), too self-aware of their purpose in the film. Nick and Natasha’s characters would have been better in the film if they we presented more strongly as keeping an eye on/reining in Tony Stark, with the future connections being much more under the surface.
- Don Cheadle never looked really comfortable in the role of Rhodey, doubly so when in the armor. Maybe it chafed?
- It took me a long time to accept the Justin Hammer character. Once I was able to interpret him as being a Tony Stark wanna-be — everything he does is in imitation of Tony Stark, aping what Stark does without an understanding of why and how — then I was able to grasp the character better.
- Referencing the 1970s Stark Expo as “Expo ’74” threw me a bit, since “Expo ’74” was the name for the Spokane World’s Fair, which I fondly recall attending as a kid.
No comments:
Post a Comment